CO129-279 - Public Offices - 1897 — Page 118

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

14

We are given to understand that the Registrar Department and the space allotted to the Bailiffs and Interpreters are necessarily placed on the Ground Floor of the Court block and that the area allotted to them cannot be reduced. This being so,

we can only come to the conclusion, that the area of plot No.1 is insufficient for the proper housing of the legal offices. A glance at the plan will show that the arrangements are already somewhat congested and that there is no adequate space available for the proper disposition of the necessary rooms as above indicated, and would render any future extension impossible.

Plot No.2 is on the other hand somewhat sparsely occupied. The handsome Western Frontage with its double-storied colonnade is for the most part a screen to small and unimportant offices, and the centre part of the upper floor, on the North front, is a mere shell to protect from the direct rays of the sun the skylight, which gives a borrowed light to the entrance hall of the Post Office. We cannot but regard the interruption of the public footway by the raised portion outside the delivery office as an inconvenience to the Public which should be avoided.

It will therefore be seen that, while Plot No.1 appears insufficient for its purpose, Plot No.2 is somewhat in excess of the requirements, and we would suggest for consideration the following schemes:-

Scheme A. Placing the courts and their accessories on Plot No.2 and the Post Office &c on Plot No.1. This would necessitate the raising of a central portion of the Post Office building an extra storey which could be reached by lifts, and taking into consideration the expensive character of the foundations, the further utilisation of the site in this manner seems an economical one.

Scheme B. The Plots Nos.3 and 4 (on the accompanying sketch) now the property of the Bank, could perhaps be acquired

-3-

and

Edit History

2026-05-30 07:03:47 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
14 We are given to understand that the Registrar Department and the space allotted to the Bailiffs and Interpreters are necessarily placed on the Ground Floor of the Court block and that the area allotted to them cannot be reduced. This being so, we can only come to the conclusion, that the area of plot No.1 is insufficient for the proper housing of the legal offices. A glance at the plan will show that the arrangements are already somewhat congested and that there is no adequate space available for the proper disposition of the necessary rooms as above indicated, and would render any future extension impossible. Plot No.2 is on the other hand somewhat sparsely occupied. The handsome Western Frontage with its double-storied colonnade is for the most part a screen to small and unimportant offices, and the centre part of the upper floor, on the North front, is a mere shell to protect from the direct rays of the sun the skylight, which gives a borrowed light to the entrance hall of the Post Office. We cannot but regard the interruption of the public footway by the raised portion outside the delivery office as an inconvenience to the Public which should be avoided. It will therefore be seen that, while Plot No.1 appears insufficient for its purpose, Plot No.2 is somewhat in excess of the requirements, and we would suggest for consideration the following schemes:- Scheme A. Placing the courts and their accessories on Plot No.2 and the Post Office &c on Plot No.1. This would necessitate the raising of a central portion of the Post Office building an extra storey which could be reached by lifts, and taking into consideration the expensive character of the foundations, the further utilisation of the site in this manner seems an economical one. Scheme B. The Plots Nos.3 and 4 (on the accompanying sketch) now the property of the Bank, could perhaps be acquired -3- and
Baseline (Original)
14 We are given to understand that the Registrar Department and the space allotted to the Baliffs and Interpreters are necessarily placed on the Ground Floor of the Court block and that the area allotted to them cannot be reduced. This being 30, we can only come to the conclusion, that the area of plot No.# is insufficient for the proper housing of the legal offices. A glance at the plan will show that the arrangements are already somewhat congested and that there is no adequate space available for the proper disposition of the necessary rooms as above indi- cated, and would render any future extension impossible. Plot No.2 is on the other hand somewhat sparsely occupied. The handsome Western Frontage with its double storied colonnade is for the most part a screen, to small and unimportant offices and the centre part of the upper floor, on the North front, is a mere shell, to protect from the direct rays of the sun the skylight, which gives a borrowed light to the entrance hall of the Post Office. We cannot but regard the interruption of the public footway by the raised portion outside the delivery office, as an inconvenience to the Public which should be avoided. It will therefore be seen that, while Plot No.1 appears insufficient for its purpose, Plot No.2 is somewhat in excess of the requirements, and we would suggest for consideration the following schemes:- Scheme A. Placing the courts and their accessories on Plot No.2 and the Post Office &c on Plot No.1. This woula necessitate the raising of a central portion or the Post Office building an extra storey which could be reached by lifts and taking into consideration the expensive character of the founda- tions, the further utilisation of the site in this manner, seems an economical one. Scheme B. The Plots Nos. 3 and 4 (on the accompanying sketch) now the property of the Bank, could perhaps be acquired -3- and
2026-05-30 07:03:47 · Baseline
View content

14

We are given to understand that the Registrar

Department and the space allotted to the Baliffs and Interpreters

are necessarily placed on the Ground Floor of the Court block

and that the area allotted to them cannot be reduced. This being

30,

we can only come to the conclusion, that the area of plot No.#

is insufficient for the proper housing of the legal offices. A

glance at the plan will show that the arrangements are already

somewhat congested and that there is no adequate space available

for the proper disposition of the necessary rooms as above indi-

cated, and would render any future extension impossible.

Plot No.2 is on the other hand somewhat sparsely

occupied. The handsome Western Frontage with its double storied

colonnade is for the most part a screen, to small and unimportant

offices and the centre part of the upper floor, on the North

front, is a mere shell, to protect from the direct rays of the

sun the skylight, which gives a borrowed light to the entrance

hall of the Post Office. We cannot but regard the interruption

of the public footway by the raised portion outside the delivery

office, as an inconvenience to the Public which should be avoided.

It will therefore be seen that, while Plot No.1

appears insufficient for its purpose, Plot No.2 is somewhat in

excess of the requirements, and we would suggest for consideration

the following schemes:-

Scheme A. Placing the courts and their accessories on

Plot No.2 and the Post Office &c on Plot No.1. This woula

necessitate the raising of a central portion or the Post Office

building an extra storey which could be reached by lifts and

taking into consideration the expensive character of the founda-

tions, the further utilisation of the site in this manner, seems

an economical one.

Scheme B. The Plots Nos. 3 and 4 (on the accompanying

sketch) now the property of the Bank, could perhaps be acquired

-3-

and

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.